It’s not often that I find myself agreeing with The Oregonian, especially with a progressive commentator, especially with a 17 year old Portland progressive commentator.
Yet that’s what happened yesterday.
The Great Silencing in High School
Oliver Kine wrote the newspaper to express concern that, on his high school campus, nobody is allowed to publicly express views that disagree with progressive orthodoxy.
He is captain of their debate team and finds no political debates whatsoever happening on his campus.
When he interviewed fellow students, he found the closet conservatives he was looking for and they told him why they never share their views.
Oliver contrasted his “no debates allowed” culture with the culture his dad enjoyed on campuses as a young man of late night debates and the free exchange of ideas without censorship or shaming opposing views.
These debates and lively exchanges are what shaped his own dad’s progressivism.
And, ironically, these same kinds of activities shaped my own biblical conservatism in matters of the soul and of values, and proneness to innovative, outside-the-box thinking within organizations, while in college.
You can read about Oliver’s experience on his campus here.
The Great Silencing Among Adults
Sadly, you can experience the great silencing for yourself on Facebook.
Because I have a wide array of friends and relatives in my circle, I enjoy an interesting galaxy of diverse views on my feed.
Or at least I did, until the election of 2016.
Three behaviors practiced by devotees of Donald Trump or progressivism have become intolerable.
The fear and loathing, the utter contempt and outright hatred, the narcissism and rage are at over-the-top levels and out of control on both sides.
Three Toxic Markers of Silencing
How does it work?
The first is a requirement of extreme loyalty.
No questions allowed, no different views tolerated, no criticisms permitted–even those from within their own camp.
The second is extreme defensiveness.
Any views that disagree are dangerous and impermissible.
They must be fought and argued no matter what, no matter what relationships are sacrificed, no matter how hostile one needs to be to prevail.
The third is the use of shaming and silencing.
It’s not enough to disagree and debate.
Contrary views must be driven from the group, eliminated from the feed, and those who speak them need to be humiliated and made to confess and recant–or else.
Driving Disagreement Underground
I find this unholy threesome on both sides.
And, as a bit of a maverick, I both notice it when its happening and have myself felt the ire of both sides.
Because I don’t drink from the Donald Trump Kool-aid or the progressivist Kool-aid.
And I dare to say so as thoughtfully, and mercifully, and minimally as possible.
Now, for my own sanity, I have had to “see less of” to far more posts than I ever have before due to this aggressive and extreme shaming and hostility and drum-beating from both sides.
But what this seventeen year old debate captain found was that shaming and silencing change nobody’s hearts.
It just drives deeply held values and views underground–just like in communist or fascist societies where everyone wears a mask and nobody is honest in public.
And, what’s worse, views driven underground to fester in suppression and humiliation tend to grow more extreme and are expressed vehemently when they finally come out.
Which creates a counter-point of extreme loyality, extreme defensiveness, and shaming and silencing within opposite circles where people can say what they want without being silenced or shamed.
In other words, we are in a mutually, self-reinforcing vicious circle of hostility breeding counter-hostility, silencing of dissent breeding the counter silencing of dissent, and extremism breeding counter extremism.
What Can Be Done?
First, it’s time for us all to demote our bloated egos and give up on the grandiose project of making everyone else in the universe see it our way.
You and I are not that important, after all, and the universe doesn’t revolve around us.
Let’s humble ourselves, in other words.
Second, it’s time for us to shut our little pie holes and give our texting thumbs a rest and put the keyboard away.
Speak as a last resort, comment on as few posts as possible, argue very few times a year and listen as a default mode of interaction.
Get into no public debates on Facebook if it can possibly be avoided.
Think outside the box and admit your own side’s faults, shortcomings, and problems–self-confess and self-correct openly.
Both conservatism and progressivism have wounded many souls along the way–denying it won’t help your cause.
Challenge and correct only in private messages as gently as possible and with a genuine kindness and real relationship with the person we’re appealing to.
Written words always sound harsher than meant–so pick up the phone or, far better, meet face to face and look people in the eye and repeat back to them what they’ve just told you so they know you really heard them even if you still disagree.
Tell people, “Thanks for sharing your honest opinion–it keeps me sharp!”
Have an Anchor to Keep You Honest
Finally, ask haunting questions that help the other person put themselves in your shoes or the shoes of those they are denouncing.
I didn’t pull these things out of thin air.
I got them from the Book of Proverbs and the Gospels.
Jesus was the master of answering insincere, gotcha questions with haunting, soul-penetrating questions in return.
He was the master of self-regulation, not losing Himself in the heat of the moment, and not reacting to the reactions of others.
He was surprisingly kind to unlikely people and had compassion even on His enemies but saw right through them, too.
He changed minds and won hearts and saved souls–conquering the resistant and the stubborn with undeserved grace and killing them with kindness.
Go thou and do likewise.
You must be logged in to post a comment.